윤창중 전 대변인에게 가장 최선의 방안은 그를 고발한 여성을 맞고소 하는 것이다. 그리고 필요하면 추후에 이남기 등을 고소하는 것이다. 아래에는 우선 그 여성에 대한 맞고소에 필요한
문서를 작성하였다. 윤창중 전 대변인과 접촉이 되는 분은 이 글을 그에게 전해주시기 바란다.
COUNTER SUIT (Draft) 맞 고소장 (초안)
PLAINTIFF: Yoon, Chang-Joong, a citizen of Republic of Korea 원고: 윤창중
DEFENDANT: The complainant ‘Ms. A’ of Criminal Report No. 13060903 of
MPD Washington D.C. 피고: 윤창중을 고소한 여성 Ms. A
DESIRED VERDICT: The charge by the defendant Ms. A be dismissed, and
all the expenses related to the legal litigations between Yoon and
Ms. A be paid by Ms. A, the defendant, in full.
원하는 판결: Ms. A는 소를 취하하고 소송에 관련된 모든 경비를 책임진다.
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT: 논거 요약
The sexual abuse misdemeanor charge filed against Mr. Yoon, Chang-Joong by Ms. A, as specified in Complaint Report No. 13060903, is groundless and false. Her accusation has cost Yoon, the plaintiff, his job, reputation, and livelihood entirely. The plaintiff plead that her charge against Yoon be dismissed immediately, and that she pays all the expenses incurred related to any and all legal litigations that have happened in the past and also could happen in the future between Yoon and her, regardless of who is the originator of the legal litigation.
미스 A의 고발은 근거 없으며, 윤창중의 평판과
직장을 앗아갔다. 미스 A의 고발을 즉시 각하시키고, 모든 소송 경비는 그녀가 책임져야 한다.
The charge as listed in Complaint No. 13060903 is a sexual misdemeanor, and more specifically ‘Yoon Grabbed her buttocks without her permission’ in the hour between 9 :30 PM and 10 PM of May 7th.
5월 7일 오후 9시 반에서 10시 사이에, 윤창중이 ‘허락 없이 그녀의 엉덩이를 잡았다’는 것이 그녀의 고발 사유이다.
Legally, grabbing buttocks without permission is not necessarily a crime of any sort. For example, a lover grabs the buttocks of his lover without permission without having to fear about a possibility that he could be charged of any crime. Also, it does not constitute a crime if a person grabs buttocks of a companion as an advance gesture so as to measure the level of affinity or affection of the companion toward himself at the particular moment.
허락 없이 엉덩이를 잡았다고 모두 범죄는 아니다. 애인은 그런 짓을 한다. 그리고, 합석한 둘 중 한 사람이 상대방의 마음을 떠보느라고 엉덩이를 잡은 것도 범죄가 아니다.
It constitutes a legal crime only when the companionat the receiving end of the action makes it genuinely clear, via either verbal utterances or bodily motion, that the action is definitely unwanted, and, when, despite the clear message, the action is repeated.
합석한 당사자가 말로나 행동으로서 그 행동을 원하지 않는다고 명백히 의사를 밝히고, 그럼에도 불구하고 그 짓이 반복될 때 범죄가 성립한다.
Here, ‘genuinely clear’ and ‘definitely unwanted’ are important because in some cases the person at the receiving end makes verbal or bodily resistance out of shyness or in order to maintain her dignity even though she does not consider the action offensive at that particular moment. Most of the loves and affectionate relations are matured, or terminated, through such an act of tentative advancement and responses thereof.
수줍거나 체모를 지키기 위하여 저항을 보이는 경우가 있다.
사랑과 친밀한 남녀관계는 마음을 떠보는 행위와 그에 대한 반응으로서 둘 사이의 관계가 성숙하기도 하고 깨지기도 한다.
As witnessed by the chauffe
ur who accompanied Yoon and Ms. A most of the time during the day throughout the evening, Yoon and Ms. A spent a few hours, from around 9 PM to around midnight in a quite cordial and friendly atmosphere in thebar, and then the lobby, of the hotel specified on the complaint report.
당시 운전기사가 목격했듯이, 저녁 9시부터 자정 경까지의 그 동석은 우호적인 분위기에서 지속되었다.
She is not related to Yoon in any obligatory fashion such as employer-employee relationship or any that sort. Yoon was a temporary visitor from Korea, and Ms. A his guide during Yoon’s stay in D.C. over two days. As such, Ms. A could offer a convenient excuse and end the encounter anytime she wanted. However, she was a willing partner of the encounter in the evening all along. Specifically, the chauffeur is said to witness no unpleasant moment in which Yoon made a bodily advancement only to cause Ms. A to lodge a protest.
그녀는 윤과 상하관계도 아니었다. 적당한 이유를 둘러대고 그 자리를 끝낼 수 있었다. 그러나 그녀는 그 저녁 내내 기꺼이 합석을 하였다. 특히 그 운전기사의 증언에 의하면, 윤이 무슨 행동을 하여 그녀가 저항을 하던 일은 본 적이 없다고 한다.
The chauffeur is known to have said that the encounter lasted until the bar was closed at the due time, and Ms. A and Yoon moved to the hotel lobby to continue chatting until around midnight.
그 운전기사에 의하면, 그 술 바가 닫을 시간이 되어 닫은 후 그들은 로비로 옮겨 자정 경까지 이야기를 나누었다.
It is not clear why Ms. A stated in the complaint that the encounter lasted only about 30 minutes and endedat 10 PM. In order to respect her probable wish that she wants to let the world know that she did not stay with Yoon beyond 10 PM, Yoon also maintained in his public interview thatthe meeting ended at 10 PM after about 30 minutes of chatting over wines. However, the truth is that Ms. Yoon was a willing partner in that evening willing to prolong the encounter to near midnight in a cordial and friendly atmosphere.
그녀는 그 고발장에서 그들의 만남이 오후 9시 반부터 10시까지라고 하였는데 그 이유는 모르겠으나, 윤은 그녀가 그렇게 세상에 알려지기를 원하는 것으로 여기고, 그도 또한, 그녀의 처지를 위하여, 그의 기자회견에서도 9시 반에서 10시 사이 30분 정도 만났다고 진술하였다.
Accordingly, one could surmise very safely that there did not exist any intention on the part of Ms. A to lodge a charge against Yoon of sexual misconduct related to the encounter in that evening.
그날 저녁, 그녀가 고발할 증후는 없었다.
Then Ms. A filed a charge in the following day, claiming that, as specified in the MPS Report 13060903, Yoon had ‘grabbed her buttocks without her permission’ during the encounter of the previous evening, more specifically between 9:30 PM and 10:00 PM.
그런데 그 다음 날 그녀는 고발하였다.
This accusation is very absurd in its extreme because Ms. A did not lodge any protest or that sort in the evening, at least to a level that deserves a legal suit. The chauffer did not witness any of such moments. Granted that he did not stay with Ms. A and Yoon all the time in its entirety during the evening, but the durations of the absence were rather scanty and minimal, which means very clearly that the atmosphere between Ms. A and Yoon was far from being hostile or problematic in that evening. The encounter proceeded, and then ended, in a cordial and friendly manner.
그 고발은 극히 괴이하다. 그 전날 저녁에, 적어도 고발을 할 수준의 저항을 보이지 않았기 때문이다. 그 운전기사는 그러한 장면을 목격하지 않았다. 운전기사는 자리를 뜬 적이 있었지만 대부분 같이 있었고, 고로 전체적 분위기는 적대적이거나 그러지 않았다. 그 자리는 우호적으로 진행되었고 끝났었다.
In short, Yoon was not offered any chances and opportunities to remedy his behavior if it was indeed sexually offensive to Ms. A. Ms. A filed an afore-mentioned complaint suddenly and out of the blue sky in a very belated hour.
즉, 윤이 그 저녁에 그녀에게 뭔가 잘못한 것이 있다면 당시 그 잘못을 시정할 기회를 그녀로부터 받지 못했다. 뒤늦게 청천벽력처럼 고발을 했다.
One could even speculate that Ms. A’s intention is to frame Yoon, with an ill-intention of tainting Yoon’s reputation and destroying his career and livelihood. Yoon is the primary spokesman for the president of Korea, Park, Geun-Hye, who was visiting president Obama during the particular days involved with this incident of sexual misconduct accusation. In particular, Yoon, having been a quite hawkish conservative columnist before the appointment by the president to the spokesman position, has been a main target of leftists in Korea, and also in the Korean American communities in USA. He is one of the most hated personalities by the leftists in the Korean political arena.
윤이 좌파로부터 미움을 엄청 받는 극우 칼럼니스트였었으므로 미스 A가 그를 함정에 빠뜨렸다는 소문이 한국과 재미교포
사회에서 떠돈다.
There are speculations milling around in Korea, and Korean American communities in USA as
well, that Yoon is a victim of political plot engineered by the leftists. The truth of the accusation is at large, yet, there is a grain of the truth in that Yoon is one of the most wanted enemies in the eyes of the leftists.
좌파들이 꾸민 음모에 빠졌다는 소문이다. 떠도는 이야기이기는 하지만 윤이 좌파의 표적이라는 점 때문에 그러한 소문이 떠도는 이유는 이해된다.
There is an accusation that Yoon chose to escape the scene of crime, and departed USA in a big hurry in that afternoon just after the complaint had been filed by Ms. A, and that, by doing so, Yoon acknowledged implicitly his guilt of the crime he is accused of.
윤이 현장을 떠나고, 급히
미국을 떠나고, 그러므로 유죄를 인정한 것이나 진배 없다는 비난도 존재한다.
This is totally false. Yo
on insisted on staying in D.C. and defend himself as he was not guilty of any crime. However, his superior Mr. Lee, Nam-Gi and his subordinates ganged up together, and ordered and forced Yoon to leave Washington D.C. and USA in that afternoon. Then they fabricated all kinds of rumors that Yoon had made the decision to leave USA on his own, and in doing so, acknowledged his guilt, arranged the departure on his own, made a false excuse that he was leaving because his wife had fallen into sudden sickness, on and on. All these rumors turned out to be false, mostly fabricated by Lee, Nam-Gi and his people
이는 전혀 사실무근이다. 그는 남아서 방어를 하겠다고 우겼다. 그러나 그의 상관인 이남기와 그의 부하들이 합세하여 윤을 떠나도록 만들었다. 그리고 그들은 온갖 소문을 만들어서, 윤이 스스로 떠났다, 그래서 유죄를 인정한 셈이다, 출발 준비도 스스로 했다, 부인이 갑자기 아파서 떠난다는 변명도 스스로 만들었다는 등 소문이 있었던바, 이는 이남기와 그의 사람들이 조작한 것으로 들어났다.
It is known that Lee disliked Yoon to the extreme. Lee was quoted ofsaying that having Yoon as his subordinate is the most disastrous event in his entire life.
이남기는 윤을 극도로 싫어했으며, 윤이 그의 부하가 된 것이 그의 일생에서 가장 큰 재앙이었다고 한 발언이 인용되었다.
On the matter related to all the fabrications and the manipulations engineered by Lee, Gi-Nam and his people, a separate writing has been prepared, and is attached to this law suit file.
그 모든 조작과 교란작전에 대해서는 별도로 문서가 준비되었으며, 아래 동봉한다.
STATEMENT REGARDING LEE, NAM-GI’S FABRICATION RELATED TO THE LEAGAL SUIT BY MS. A:
it is Lee, Nam-Gi, theaide to President Park, Geun-Hye for public relationship (‘Hongbo Suseok’), who has turned the Yoon’s sex scandal into an unmanageable feeding frenzy. And the victims who have hurt most from his deed areYoon, Chang-Joong, and also the president, and Korea as a nation.
Let’s reconstruct the event:
Yoon, Chang-Joong got on a plane heading back to Korea on the eighth of May immediately after he had found himself engulfed in the sex scandal. As the journey was made in a big hurry, only seat he could find was of the business class.
Lee, Nam-Gi was in a position to know Yoon’s sudden departure as he is the immediate superior of Yoon according to the Blue House official organization system, but it has been found that Lee chose not to report the sexual scandal and Yoon’s departure to the president for 24 hours or longer. Lee told reporters that he had briefed to the president immediately, but this statement of his was found later to be false. Actually Lee had made false statements a few times only to correct them later when the truths turned up.
In particular, Lee did not inform to the president about the incident, leaving the president in the dark completely, even though he was confined in the presidential airplane along with the president over five hours en route from D.C. to LA that afternoon.
On this, Lee has made a series of mumbo-jumbos, but his decision not to inform the president still remains quite baffling beyond anybody’s comprehension. Despite of the fact that the news would become a sizzling hot topic across the world very soon, why did Lee leave the president in the dark during the long and dreary five-hour flight? And, furthermore, he delayed
reporting even further after the flight, alas, to the next day, makingthe incomprehensible delay in reporting cumulatively24 hours or even longer. It would not be possible for Lee to lodge a protest even if people say that he might have a hidden agenda of his own behind the unforgivable and even treacherous act.
And, Lee has claimed all along that it was Yoon who made the decision to leave Washington D.C. in a big hurry (presumably to avoid an impending arrest or the sort, and ultimately to dodge the investigation by the local police). By doing so, Lee made Yoon appear very guilty of the crime he was accused of. It is reasonable to assume that Lee painted Yoon as a genuinely guilty of the charge when he broke the news to the president at a long last. That is, he would have said to the president that "Yoon acknowledged his guilt, and chose to escape to Korea on his own will!", which would be enough to enrage the president so much so that she would order Yoon’s dismissal summarily from his position as the President’s Spokesman.
In summary, it was Lee, Nam-Gi who made Yoon, Chang-Joong as guilty as charged. "It is not even necessary to wait for the investigation and court proceeding. Yoon acknowledged his guilt, and hurried back to Korea!" That is the message that Lee formulated and delivered to the president,and also to the world. (To be beefed up further with more events and details as need arise)
윤창중 전 대변인의 주미 한국대사관 문화원 인턴 성희롱 혐의는 이남기 홍보수석이 키웠고, 그 가장 큰 피해자는 윤창중과 그리고 박근혜 대통령과 대한민국이었다.
당시 상황을 재구성해보자:
윤창중 당시 대변인이 성희롱 사안에 말려들었을 때, 8일 낮에 윤창중은 귀국 길에 오르게 된다. 갑자기 귀국하므로
비즈니스석밖에 없었을 것이었다.
청와대 조직 상 윤창중의 상관인 이남기 홍보수석은 이를 알고 있었으나 박근혜 대통령에게 24시간 이상 보고를 하지 않은 것으로 들어났다. 이남기는 즉시 보고했다고 기자들에게 이야기했지만 이는 사실이 아닌 것으로 들어났다. 이남기의 말 바꾸기는 이뿐 아니라 여러 차례 있었다.
특히, 워싱턴에서 LA로 가는 전용기 안에서 이남기는5시간 동안 대통령과 함께 있었으나 보고를 하지 않은 것으로 들어났다.
이에
대하여 이남기는 여러 가지로 변명 내지 설명을 하지만, 이는 전혀 납득이 갈 수 없는 처신이었다. 세계적으로 뜨거운 뉴스거리가 될 사안을 5시간 비행 중 보고를 안 했다? 결국 24시간 이상이 지난 후에 처음으로 보고했다? 어떤 저의가 있었을 것이라고 추측해도 이남기 수석은 변명할 여지가 별로 없다.
그리고 이남기는 "윤창중이 스스로 귀국을 선택했다"고 주장했다. 즉, 윤창중 자신이 ‘성희롱 유죄’를 인정한 것으로 사안을 귀착시켰다. 그리고 24시간 후 늑장보고에서도 그렇게 대통령에게 보고를 한 것으로 추정된다. "윤창중 스스로 유죄를 인정하고 자발적으로 귀국 길에 올랐다"는 보고에 대통령은 격노하고 윤창중을 해임(경질)하라고 명했을 것으로 추정된다.
즉, 윤창중 성희롱의 유죄 무죄 판결은 이남기가 결정한 것이 된다. "수사와 재판을 기다릴 필요도 없다, 윤창중이 스스로 유죄를 인정하고 귀국 길에 올랐다!", 이 것이 이남기가 초래한 결과였다.(필요하면 더 많은 상세한 사항들을 제공할 것이다)
sheem_sk@naver.com *필자/심상근. 미 버클리대 박사. 칼럼니스트.