경축! 미국 선제폭격론 다시 급부상! - 자유논객연합 :: 논객넷

로그인

마이페이지

이용안내

고객센터

통합검색












회원가입 아이디·비밀번호찾기

토론방

자유토론방

홈 > 토론방 > 자유토론방

자유토론방

경축! 미국 선제폭격론 다시 급부상!

작성자:

한반도

조회: 29075 등록일: 2013-04-18

<p align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; text-align: left; line-height: 150%; -ms-word-break: keep-all; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; mso-outline-level: 1;">Time for a preemptive strike against North Korea? Some say yes<o:p></o:p><p align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; text-align: left; line-height: 150%; -ms-word-break: keep-all; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; mso-outline-level: 2;">A University of Texas professor argues for a strike against North Korea in a New York Times op-ed. Some US military planners are sympathetic to the idea, while others accuse him of being a warmonger.<o:p></o:p>By Anna Mulrine | Christian Science Monitor – Mon, Apr 15, 2013<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/time-preemptive-strike-against-north-korea-yes-233103575.html">http://news.yahoo.com/time-preemptive-strike-against-north-korea-yes-233103575.html</a><o:p></o:p> At the office of the secretary of Defense in <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/The+Pentagon" target="_self">the Pentagon</a>, a plan for a preemptive military attack on <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/North+Korea" target="_self">North Korea</a> was being presented to “a small, grim group.”<o:p></o:p>“The plan was impressive,” recalled an official who was at the presentation by <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/U.S.+Armed+Forces" target="_self">US military</a> strategists. “It could be executed with only a few days’ alert, and it would entail little or no risk of US casualties during the attack.”<o:p></o:p>It was also designed to have a low risk of North Korean casualties. But it allowed for some troubling contingencies.<o:p></o:p>RECOMMENDED: <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0417/Kim-101-How-well-do-you-know-North-Korea-s-leaders/North-Korea-s-size" target="_blank">Kim 101: How well do you know North Korea's leaders?</a> <o:p></o:p>“In particular, we wanted the plan to fully reflect that nuclear weapons were not the only weapons of mass destruction that North Korea had been working on. They clearly had chemical weapons, and their interest in biological weapons and ballistic missiles was also evident,” the official recalled. “We all knew that we were poised on the brink of a war that might involve weapons of mass destruction.”<o:p></o:p>The official was then-<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/William+Perry" target="_self">Secretary of Defense William Perry</a>, and the year was 1994. He recounts the episode in a book he cowrote with Ashton Carter, who is now the No. 2 civilian at the Pentagon: “Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America.”<o:p></o:p>Such an attack didn’t occur in 1994, but today, in the face of North Korea’s belligerence, some are suggesting that the Pentagon dust off its plans.<o:p></o:p><a href="http://link.csmonitor.com/join/34f/dcdecodersignup" target="_new">Want your top political issues explained? Get customized DC Decoder updates.</a><o:p></o:p>“They have made a threat, and they have made a weapon – and it seems to me that is a legitimate reason for self-defense,” says Jeremi Suri, a professor of history and public affairs at the <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/University+of+Texas+at+Austin" target="_self">University of Texas, Austin</a>.<o:p></o:p>“We don’t want the Iranians, or North Koreans, or anyone else thinking it’s not – and if we wait for the next threat, the damage could be far worse,” Dr. Suri argues. “The safest thing to do is to destroy this weapon on the launchpad.”<o:p></o:p>It is an argument that Suri made in a <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/The+New+York+Times+Company" target="_self">New York Times</a> op-ed on Friday entitled, “Bomb North Korea, Before It’s Too Late.”<o:p></o:p>“<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Barack+Obama" target="_self">President Obama</a> should state clearly and forthrightly that this is an act of self-defense in response to explicit threats from North Korea and clear evidence of a prepared weapon,” Suri writes.<o:p></o:p>“And he should explain that this is a limited defensive strike on a military target – an operation that poses no threat to civilians – and that America does not intend to bring about regime change. The purpose is to neutralize a clear and present danger. That is all,” he writes.<o:p></o:p>Suri says that the feedback he has received on his piece has run the spectrum, from those who accuse him of being a warmonger to US military planners sympathetic to the idea.<o:p></o:p>“A lot are frustrated that we’re playing this game with North Korea every year,” he says.<o:p></o:p>The consequences of a strike could be dire, Suri concedes. North Korean leader <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Kim+Jong-un" target="_self">Kim Jong-un</a> could decide, for example, to fire off some of the thousands of artillery rounds in his possession toward <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Seoul" target="_self">Seoul</a>, <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/South+Korea" target="_self">South Korea</a>, potentially killing tens of thousands of people.<o:p></o:p>But there’s some likelihood that Kim will instead “save face at home by saying, ‘Look, we’re so important that they have to attack us’ and retaliate instead on a smaller scale,” Suri says.<o:p></o:p>This might include “trying to assassinate someone in South Korea or attacking an island” – in other words, one of the responses they have tried in the past.<o:p></o:p>“My belief is that if we take out this missile now, and we make it clear it’s an act of self-defense, the choice they have is face suicide or not respond,” Suri says. “I think they will choose not to commit suicide.”<o:p></o:p>Indeed, it might boil down “to being the best of bad options,” he says.<o:p></o:p>It is similar to an argument that Messrs. Perry and Carter recall making in their book.<o:p></o:p>“I went over the ‘talking points’ prepared by my staff, which sketched out how we should explain to the president the difficult choice he had to make,” they wrote.<o:p></o:p>As the assistant secretary of Defense for international security policy, Carter supported the development of the strike plan.<o:p></o:p>Perry decided to begin his briefing to the president with a statement attributed to <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/John+Kenneth+Galbraith" target="_self">John Kenneth Galbraith</a>: “Politics is not the art of the possible. Rather it consists of choosing between what is disastrous and what is merely unpalatable.”<o:p></o:p>“We were about to give the president a choice between a disastrous option – allowing North Korea to get a nuclear arsenal, which we might have to face someday – and an unpalatable option, blocking this development, but thereby risking a destructive non-nuclear war,” they wrote. “How had we gotten to this position?”<o:p></o:p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Bill+Clinton" target="_self">President Clinton</a> was “within minutes of selecting and authorizing” a deployment option when the meeting was interrupted by a phone call from former <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Jimmy+Carter" target="_self">President Carter</a>, who had been dispatched to North Korea to negotiate on behalf of the <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/United+States" target="_self">United States</a>. <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Kim+Il-sung" target="_self">Kim Il-sung</a>, then the aging leader of the regime, had agreed to negotiate.<o:p></o:p>What will happen this time?<o:p></o:p>RECOMMENDED: <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0417/Kim-101-How-well-do-you-know-North-Korea-s-leaders/North-Korea-s-size" target="_blank">Kim 101: How well do you know North Korea's leaders?</a> <o:p></o:p>

댓글 : 8 건



이전글	중장년층 고용확대로 경제난 타개하자
다음글	prentice capital management website

번호	제목	작성자	조회	등록일
46283	정당 국고보조금은 하늘에서 떨어졌나? [6]	아침이슬	7090	2014-11-11

46282	나라가 개판인 까닭은 공권력이 무너졌기 때문이다! [6]	국민검사	9386	2014-11-09

46281	설훈과 새민련은 말을하라! [6]	地中海	7320	2014-11-07

46280	논객넷 단행본 출간에 대한 안내 (대표논객 필독) [6]	비바람	13760	2014-11-02

46279	왜 19대국회는 개헌주도가 불가한가? [6]	진실과 영혼	9441	2014-10-27

46278	애국보수들은 늘 외롭다! [6]	아침이슬	9388	2014-10-25

46277	설훈과 정동영 그리고 김대중 [6]	地中海	6680	2014-10-20

46276	환풍구 설치법 변경입니다 [6]	최성령	7089	2014-10-18

46275	비정상 민주화유공자의 정상화가 시급하다 [6]	비바람	7374	2014-10-12

46274	가을이 가기 전에 [6]	아침이슬	7165	2014-10-12

46273	왜 최룡해를 체포하지 못했는가 [6]	비바람	8079	2014-10-05

46272	김현과 새민련과 김정은 [6]	流雲	7155	2014-10-05

46271	MB는 아침이슬...박근혜는 가고파를 부르려는가? [6]	진실과 영혼	8050	2014-10-03

46270	"아들이 아버지에게 보낸 충고 문자!" [6]	국민검사	7295	2014-09-29

46269	김현과 영등포 경찰서 누가 갑일까? [6]	조고아제	7530	2014-09-22

46268	참, 잘~ 뽑았어! [6]	국민검사	8715	2014-09-19

46267	신참으로서 느낀 논객넷 논객들 [6]	流雲	8315	2014-09-17

46266	김무성이 보수면 박지원은 수구꼴통이다! [6]	진실과 영혼	7631	2014-09-11

46265	가을 그리고 한가위 [6]	최성령	8076	2014-09-07

46264	동북아의 정세와 한반도의 미래... [6]	국민검사	8621	2014-09-04

46263	신부 수녀들은 광화문에서 무슨 짓을 하는가! [6]	정재학	7444	2014-08-29

46262	단식 똑바로 하라! [6]	국민검사	7536	2014-08-26

46261	[음악/49] 잠시 쉬어가시죠! / 남진의 '빈잔' 그리고 '나훈아' [6]	국민검사	8782	2014-08-19

46260	유언(遺言)... "내가 죽거든...!" [6]	국민검사	7809	2014-08-15

46259	옛날사진(1945~1946)- 광복 69주년, 건국66주년의 날에 [6]	地中海	10346	2014-08-15

46258	정치인들의 영화관람 [6]	地中海	9270	2014-08-14

46257	국민혈세 함부로 탕진말라! [6]	아침이슬	7010	2014-08-11

46256	[虛像] (♬) [6]	국민검사	7616	2014-08-10

46255	"효자는 부모가 만들고, 훌륭한 부모는 자식이 만든다!" (♬) [6]	국민검사	7562	2014-08-10

46254	[음악/46] 'When I Dream' 영화 '쉬리'의 주제곡... [6]	국민검사	8352	2014-08-09

46253	게시판이 이상하군요 [6]	地中海	8704	2014-08-09

46252	재수 없는 년 & 재수 옴붙은 년 [6]	진실과 영혼	7052	2014-08-03

46251	[음악/43] 잠시 쉬어가시죠! / 사나이 눈물... [6]	국민검사	8243	2014-08-02

46250	7.30 재보선 결과 예측과 제언 [6]	진실과 영혼	8555	2014-07-27

46249	옛날사진- 1966 서울( 나의 국민학교시절의 서울) [6]	地中海	8798	2014-07-26

46248	유병언의 죽음 정몽헌 회장 닮았다! [6]	국민검사	6848	2014-07-22

46247	황우려가 교육부총리로 내정 된 까닭은 무엇일까 [6]	두류산	7107	2014-07-15

46246	각 국의 Military Parade... [6]	국민검사	7033	2014-07-14

46245	독재를 마음껏 펼치는 새민련 [6]	地中海	7160	2014-07-10

46244	박근혜 패대기 치기. [6]	산동거사	8336	2014-06-26

46243	박근혜의 사이렌(siren) [6]	비바람	6874	2014-06-25

46242	이 얼마만의 대머리 총리인가? [6]	국민검사	6479	2014-06-17

46241	대한민국의 국무총리 [6]	地中海	8232	2014-06-10

46240	세월호 참사는 6.4 지방선거에 목적을 둔 음모였다! [6]	국민검사	10755	2014-05-30

46239	서시빈목(西施矉目) 준금빈목? (제2의 선풍기 아줌마) [6]	산동거사	8334	2014-05-29

46238	유병언 못 잡으면 김진태 총장 사퇴하라! [6]	국민검사	6895	2014-05-29

46237	김문수는 대통령 되기 틀렸다 [6]	비바람	10510	2014-05-19

46236	아수라판의 팽목항 [6]	동서남북	7014	2014-05-05

46235	대한민국의 개도 이런 짓은 안 할 텐데... [6]	국민검사	7527	2014-05-02

46234	불만으로 얼룩진 우리 사회의 단상 [6]	地中海	8172	2014-05-02


21 \| 22 \| 23 \| 24 \| 25 \| 26 \| 27 \| 28 \| 29 \| 30

회원정보

가입일

2008-07-23

등급

운영자 (1)

활동

포인트 : 0 점

게시물 작성수 : 0 개

댓글 작성수 : 0 개

NCSCKDVKDJVKDJVKDV


		소음이 심해서 환풍기를 장식품으로 쓰시는 분			이용약관 - 개인정보취급방침
		소음 없이 실내를 쾌적하게 만드는 환풍기로 변신하는 마술			게시물 삭제요청방법
					Copyright(c) www.nongak.net
					tapng97@hanmail.net
					연락처 : 010-4696-7177