경축! 미국 선제폭격론 다시 급부상! - 자유논객연합 :: 논객넷

로그인

마이페이지

이용안내

고객센터

통합검색












회원가입 아이디·비밀번호찾기

토론방

자유토론방

홈 > 토론방 > 자유토론방

자유토론방

경축! 미국 선제폭격론 다시 급부상!

작성자:

한반도

조회: 28738 등록일: 2013-04-18

<p align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; text-align: left; line-height: 150%; -ms-word-break: keep-all; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; mso-outline-level: 1;">Time for a preemptive strike against North Korea? Some say yes<o:p></o:p><p align="left" class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt; text-align: left; line-height: 150%; -ms-word-break: keep-all; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; mso-outline-level: 2;">A University of Texas professor argues for a strike against North Korea in a New York Times op-ed. Some US military planners are sympathetic to the idea, while others accuse him of being a warmonger.<o:p></o:p>By Anna Mulrine | Christian Science Monitor – Mon, Apr 15, 2013<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/time-preemptive-strike-against-north-korea-yes-233103575.html">http://news.yahoo.com/time-preemptive-strike-against-north-korea-yes-233103575.html</a><o:p></o:p> At the office of the secretary of Defense in <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/The+Pentagon" target="_self">the Pentagon</a>, a plan for a preemptive military attack on <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/North+Korea" target="_self">North Korea</a> was being presented to “a small, grim group.”<o:p></o:p>“The plan was impressive,” recalled an official who was at the presentation by <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/U.S.+Armed+Forces" target="_self">US military</a> strategists. “It could be executed with only a few days’ alert, and it would entail little or no risk of US casualties during the attack.”<o:p></o:p>It was also designed to have a low risk of North Korean casualties. But it allowed for some troubling contingencies.<o:p></o:p>RECOMMENDED: <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0417/Kim-101-How-well-do-you-know-North-Korea-s-leaders/North-Korea-s-size" target="_blank">Kim 101: How well do you know North Korea's leaders?</a> <o:p></o:p>“In particular, we wanted the plan to fully reflect that nuclear weapons were not the only weapons of mass destruction that North Korea had been working on. They clearly had chemical weapons, and their interest in biological weapons and ballistic missiles was also evident,” the official recalled. “We all knew that we were poised on the brink of a war that might involve weapons of mass destruction.”<o:p></o:p>The official was then-<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/William+Perry" target="_self">Secretary of Defense William Perry</a>, and the year was 1994. He recounts the episode in a book he cowrote with Ashton Carter, who is now the No. 2 civilian at the Pentagon: “Preventive Defense: A New Security Strategy for America.”<o:p></o:p>Such an attack didn’t occur in 1994, but today, in the face of North Korea’s belligerence, some are suggesting that the Pentagon dust off its plans.<o:p></o:p><a href="http://link.csmonitor.com/join/34f/dcdecodersignup" target="_new">Want your top political issues explained? Get customized DC Decoder updates.</a><o:p></o:p>“They have made a threat, and they have made a weapon – and it seems to me that is a legitimate reason for self-defense,” says Jeremi Suri, a professor of history and public affairs at the <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/University+of+Texas+at+Austin" target="_self">University of Texas, Austin</a>.<o:p></o:p>“We don’t want the Iranians, or North Koreans, or anyone else thinking it’s not – and if we wait for the next threat, the damage could be far worse,” Dr. Suri argues. “The safest thing to do is to destroy this weapon on the launchpad.”<o:p></o:p>It is an argument that Suri made in a <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/The+New+York+Times+Company" target="_self">New York Times</a> op-ed on Friday entitled, “Bomb North Korea, Before It’s Too Late.”<o:p></o:p>“<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Barack+Obama" target="_self">President Obama</a> should state clearly and forthrightly that this is an act of self-defense in response to explicit threats from North Korea and clear evidence of a prepared weapon,” Suri writes.<o:p></o:p>“And he should explain that this is a limited defensive strike on a military target – an operation that poses no threat to civilians – and that America does not intend to bring about regime change. The purpose is to neutralize a clear and present danger. That is all,” he writes.<o:p></o:p>Suri says that the feedback he has received on his piece has run the spectrum, from those who accuse him of being a warmonger to US military planners sympathetic to the idea.<o:p></o:p>“A lot are frustrated that we’re playing this game with North Korea every year,” he says.<o:p></o:p>The consequences of a strike could be dire, Suri concedes. North Korean leader <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Kim+Jong-un" target="_self">Kim Jong-un</a> could decide, for example, to fire off some of the thousands of artillery rounds in his possession toward <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Seoul" target="_self">Seoul</a>, <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/South+Korea" target="_self">South Korea</a>, potentially killing tens of thousands of people.<o:p></o:p>But there’s some likelihood that Kim will instead “save face at home by saying, ‘Look, we’re so important that they have to attack us’ and retaliate instead on a smaller scale,” Suri says.<o:p></o:p>This might include “trying to assassinate someone in South Korea or attacking an island” – in other words, one of the responses they have tried in the past.<o:p></o:p>“My belief is that if we take out this missile now, and we make it clear it’s an act of self-defense, the choice they have is face suicide or not respond,” Suri says. “I think they will choose not to commit suicide.”<o:p></o:p>Indeed, it might boil down “to being the best of bad options,” he says.<o:p></o:p>It is similar to an argument that Messrs. Perry and Carter recall making in their book.<o:p></o:p>“I went over the ‘talking points’ prepared by my staff, which sketched out how we should explain to the president the difficult choice he had to make,” they wrote.<o:p></o:p>As the assistant secretary of Defense for international security policy, Carter supported the development of the strike plan.<o:p></o:p>Perry decided to begin his briefing to the president with a statement attributed to <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/John+Kenneth+Galbraith" target="_self">John Kenneth Galbraith</a>: “Politics is not the art of the possible. Rather it consists of choosing between what is disastrous and what is merely unpalatable.”<o:p></o:p>“We were about to give the president a choice between a disastrous option – allowing North Korea to get a nuclear arsenal, which we might have to face someday – and an unpalatable option, blocking this development, but thereby risking a destructive non-nuclear war,” they wrote. “How had we gotten to this position?”<o:p></o:p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Bill+Clinton" target="_self">President Clinton</a> was “within minutes of selecting and authorizing” a deployment option when the meeting was interrupted by a phone call from former <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Jimmy+Carter" target="_self">President Carter</a>, who had been dispatched to North Korea to negotiate on behalf of the <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/United+States" target="_self">United States</a>. <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/tags/topic/Kim+Il-sung" target="_self">Kim Il-sung</a>, then the aging leader of the regime, had agreed to negotiate.<o:p></o:p>What will happen this time?<o:p></o:p>RECOMMENDED: <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/0417/Kim-101-How-well-do-you-know-North-Korea-s-leaders/North-Korea-s-size" target="_blank">Kim 101: How well do you know North Korea's leaders?</a> <o:p></o:p>

댓글 : 8 건



이전글	중장년층 고용확대로 경제난 타개하자
다음글	prentice capital management website

번호	제목	작성자	조회	등록일
46838	뽀글이 [2]	펌	26645	2013-03-23

46837	지금은 신원조회라는 것이 없나!? [1]	보문산(寶文)	26644	2013-04-24

46836	그 놈들의 정신''을 계승하면 어떤 나라가 될까?	토함산	26643	2023-05-24

46835	어제 천안함 3주기 추모제 잘 진행 되었습니다. [1]	우국충정	26639	2013-03-27

46834	친북좌파 제거 없이 대한민국은 없다 1 [2]	정재학	26639	2013-03-21

46833	운우지정(雲雨之情)과 윤창중 파문 [1]	심철주	26631	2013-05-12

46832	개정은에 맞서는 2013 국군 군사력 현황!! [2]	한반도	26621	2013-04-02

46831	경축!! 벨오빠 전작권 전환 전면중지 입장천명!!	한반도	26600	2013-04-20

46830	개성공단 동냥깡통 찌그려 걷어찬 북한 [5]	진실과 영혼	26598	2013-04-26

46829	않철수는 빨리 미국으로... [1]	최성령	26594	2014-04-13

46828	대한민국 보수는 무엇에 분노해야 하나? [18]	뻐둥새	26594	2013-04-21

46827	북한이 전면전을 한다? [4]	최성령	26586	2013-03-16

46826	5.18 숨은 그림찿기	펑그르	26583	2016-11-16

46825	김정은이 자랑하는 특수보병부대 20만명. [1]	정문	26578	2013-04-14

46824	악마에게 영혼을 판 낸시랭과 뻐큐녀 이주혜. [1]	정문	26557	2013-04-19

46823	같이 살아야지요/잠시 쉬어갑시다. [1]	최성령	26547	2013-04-26

46822	잘못된 5.18 역사를 재조사 할때 이다	들소리	26538	2015-07-24

46821	신선 노름하느라 도끼자루 썩는다?	곽정부	26537	2013-03-24

46820	박근혜정부의 창조경제론을 말한다 [5]	참 숯	26520	2013-04-14

46819	뇌검사가 필요한 박지원 [5]	최두남	26516	2013-04-05

46818	안철수의 변신은 무죄인가? [1]	오대산	26516	2013-03-21

46817	구안(狗眼) 박지원 선생. [1]	산동거사	26501	2013-04-05

46816	지금 우리도 전쟁을 준비할 때다! [4]	조갑제펌	26484	2013-03-30

46815	한반도상황과 북한 김정은의 최후 [2]	진실과 영혼	26478	2013-03-30

46814	낸시랭, '쉿'.. “조용히 입 닥쳐”	오대산	26471	2013-04-15

46813	vdygg edcjl for 96% nqugkd5	wnaebqpuv	26466	2014-11-21

46812	어떤 만남 [1]	오대산	26463	2013-04-09

46811	윤 대변인과 가이드의 키를 비교 해 볼 수 있는 사진	조고아제	26458	2013-05-12

46810	저팔계 김정은의 핵 사기행각. [5]	정문	26454	2013-04-06

46809	브루스 커밍스를 죽이지 않으면 승산 없다 [3]	핵필	26450	2013-03-19

46808	6･15를 등에 업은 또 하나의 북타남쟁(北打南爭) [2]	오대산	26441	2013-04-30

46807	[김성만 전 해군제독] 한반도 안보정세!! [1]	한반도	26441	2013-04-08

46806	이 기집이 박근혜 대통령을 돕겠다 한다. [2]	무지개	26422	2013-04-15

46805	'궁디'에 대한 소고.	산동거사	26417	2013-05-11

46804	이외수 동거女 단독 인터뷰 영상	티비조선	26413	2013-04-21

46803	채널A] 5.18 투입 북괴 특작부대원 증언 인터뷰 [2]	일베펌	26392	2013-05-15

46802	prentice capital management website	BeeftitaSib	26388	2013-06-22

46801	민노총의 강요된 희생과 시체장사! [2]	토함산	26385	2023-05-16

46800	성접대에서 남자만 문제있고 여자는 문제 없나? [6]	조고아제	26385	2013-03-23

46799	국가보안법 못지키면 월남처럼 공산화 된다 [1]	地中海	26374	2013-03-18

46798	자유의 여슨상 - 풍자갤러리 [3]	갤러리	26368	2013-04-07

46797	자료실에 제주4.3, 대통령에게바란다, 개설	관리자	26362	2013-03-27

46796	대화? 뭐하자는 시츄에이션?	한반도	26350	2013-04-12

46795	5.16과 5.18의 역사적 진실	최성령	26341	2015-08-31

46794	운영자님께 여쭙습니다 [4]	서원골	26328	2013-03-25

46793	논객넷 기사가 떴네요 [1]	독자	26324	2013-03-18

46792	5.18의 진실 (요약)	과객	26311	2014-12-08

46791	텍사스 비료공장 폭발 - WP긴급 뉴스 [3]	진실과 영혼	26308	2013-04-18

46790	정말 딱한 아이들 [1]	딱	26291	2013-04-27

46789	<공지>전국논객연합의 명칭을 변경합니다 [5]	관리자	26291	2013-03-22


11 \| 12 \| 13 \| 14 \| 15 \| 16 \| 17 \| 18 \| 19 \| 20

회원정보

가입일

2008-07-23

등급

운영자 (1)

활동

포인트 : 0 점

게시물 작성수 : 0 개

댓글 작성수 : 0 개

NCSCKDVKDJVKDJVKDV


		소음이 심해서 환풍기를 장식품으로 쓰시는 분			이용약관 - 개인정보취급방침
		소음 없이 실내를 쾌적하게 만드는 환풍기로 변신하는 마술			게시물 삭제요청방법
					Copyright(c) www.nongak.net
					tapng97@hanmail.net
					연락처 : 010-4696-7177